<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CounterMeasures -  A Security Blog  scam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://countermeasures.trendmicro.eu/tag/scam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://countermeasures.trendmicro.eu</link>
	<description>Rik Ferguson blogs about current security issues.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 11:22:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>British police remove drop from ocean.</title>
		<link>http://countermeasures.trendmicro.eu/british-police-remove-drop-from-ocean/</link>
		<comments>http://countermeasures.trendmicro.eu/british-police-remove-drop-from-ocean/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 23:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rik Ferguson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Underground Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybercrime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://countermeasures.trendmicro.eu/?p=1572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[British law enforcement today completed a project dubbed Operation Papworth, aimed at reducing the exposure of the British online shopping public to fraudulent websites in the run up to Christmas. The Metropolitan Police Central e-Crime Unit have been widely reported in the media as &#8220;shutting down&#8221; or &#8220;taking down&#8221; more than 1200 websites peddling fraudulent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>British law enforcement today completed a project dubbed <em>Operation Papworth</em>, aimed at reducing the exposure of the British online shopping public to fraudulent websites in the run up to Christmas. The <a title="PCeU" href="http://www.met.police.uk/pceu/index.htm" target="_blank">Metropolitan Police Central e-Crime Unit</a> have been widely reported in the media as &#8220;<a title="Times Online" href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article6942583.ece?token=null&amp;offset=12&amp;page=2" target="_blank">shutting down</a>&#8221; or &#8220;<a title="The Register" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/12/03/fake_designer_kit_website_takedown/" target="_blank">taking down</a>&#8221; more than 1200 websites peddling fraudulent designer goods such as Ugg boots, ghd hair straighteners and Tiffany jewellery at temptingly low prices. I&#8217;m sure in many cases you&#8217;ve seen the &#8220;tempting&#8221; spam for yourselves.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The sites were registered with .co.uk domain names so as to appear more credible and attractive to UK based buyers, even though in many cases both the sites and the domain registrations themselves were outside the UK. Obviously people tempted into buying from these shops risked not only receiving sub-standard goods with no chance of recompense, but also having their financial details or identities stolen, abused and/or traded on the underground economy. So before I go on, let me make it clear that despite my reservations about its effectiveness, I applaud and support this initiative by UK law enforcement (I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll be relieved to hear that).</p>
<p> </p>
<p>But (and you knew there was going to be a “but”) this represents at best a stopgap measure and at worst a simple waste of time. The root cause remains unaddressed and I fully expect these same sites to reappear under different names in the very near future. The sites themselves have not been &#8220;taken down&#8221; at all as far as I can tell. What has happened is that <a title="Nominet" href="http://www.nominet.org.uk/" target="_blank">Nominet</a>, the body responsible for the .uk top-level domain has simply broken the link between the domain name and the server the site is based on. What does that mean? It means when you type www.globalugg.co.uk into your browser it doesn&#8217;t go anywhere anymore.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>If it was your criminal operation, what would you do? You&#8217;d register another domain name of course!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Here are the current details for a dodgy looking site, notice the Registration status is SUSPENDED, perhaps this was one of those 1200 sites.</p>
<div id="attachment_1573" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 316px"><a href="http://countermeasures.trendmicro.eu/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/globalugg.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-1573" title="WHOIS query for globalugg.co.uk" src="http://countermeasures.trendmicro.eu/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/globalugg.png" alt="WHOIS query for globalugg.co.uk" width="306" height="415" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">WHOIS query for globalugg.co.uk</p></div>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>There are a few other interesting bits to this registration though, look at the Registrant&#8217;s address, how can they be a &#8220;UK individual&#8221;? Notice too that the domain was not even registered in the UK, the Registrar is eNom Inc. a (totally legitimate) US-based registrar. The Name servers responsible for this domain belong to US Web Hosting, another totally above board US provider. So we have a scammer with a Chinese address, registering a .co.uk domain with an American registrar and hosting their server with another US outfit.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>To bring my whole scam back to life all I have to do is register a new domain and point it to the same server as before, maybe just for variety&#8217;s sake this time with a Ukrainian registrar, just like this:</p>
<div id="attachment_1575" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 557px"><a href="http://countermeasures.trendmicro.eu/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/realuggbootshonestly1.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-1575" title="Domain availability through Ukranian Registrar Imena" src="http://countermeasures.trendmicro.eu/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/realuggbootshonestly1.png" alt="Domain availability through Ukranian Registrar Imena" width="510" height="306" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Domain availability through Ukranian Registrar Imena</p></div>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>And <strong>that</strong> is the real issue, far too many DNS domains, including .co.uk and those of many other countries, are operated as &#8220;open&#8221; domains and in <a title="Nominet Rules" href="http://www.nominet.org.uk/registrants/aboutdomainnames/rules/" target="_blank">the words of Nominet</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;<strong><em>We do not impose restrictions on your status as applicant</em></strong><em> for the registration of a Domain Name in the following SLDs (&#8220;Open SLDs&#8221;):</em></p>
<p><em>   1. 4.4.1 .co.uk; or</em></p>
<p><em>   2. 4.4.2 .org.uk.</em></p>
<p><em>In the SLD Charter of the SLD Rules for the Open SLDs we do set out certain intentions regarding the class of applicant or use of registrations of the Domain Name which we assume you will comply with when applying for a registration of a Domain Name within an Open SLD. However, <strong>we do not forbid applications, and will take no action in respect of registrations that do not comply with the SLD Charters</strong></em>&#8220;</p></blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Until regulation is tightened and international cooperation is improved then well-intentioned initiatives like Operation Papworth will be um, micturating in the tempest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://countermeasures.trendmicro.eu/british-police-remove-drop-from-ocean/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
