In an article published today by Computerworld, it was revealed that the details of a US Secret Service safe house – one meant for the US First family in the event of a national emergency – had been leaked over peer-to-peer networks using the popular LimeWire client.

Image from limewire.com

Image from limewire.com

 

This is of course not the fault of LimeWire and there’s no reason why Mark Gorton, chairman of Lime Group, should have been lambasted at today’s hearing. It is also not the first time sensitive information has been leaked over peer-to-peer networks (think motorcades, nuclear facilities, presidential helicopter, terrorist threat assessments, mortgage data, M&A plans, healthcare data) the list is virtually endless. This is all of course without considering the extremely elevated threat from malware over (often) unscanned P2P connections to untrusted devices sharing illegal software and data. It has long been the case that distributing malware along with your warez over file-sharing networks is almost de rigeur.

 

In many ways, the nature of the data that was leaked is secondary to the potential conclusion that can be drawn from the reaction to this latest event.

 

According to the Computerworld article “The disclosures prompted the chairman of the committee Rep. Edolphus Towns, (D-N.Y.), to call for a ban on the use of peer-to-peer (P2P) software on all government and contractor computers and networks. “For our sensitive government information, the risk is simply too great to ignore,” said Towns

 

Does this mean that installations of P2P software are not already banned on sensitive networks? Does this mean that machines that routinely, or even occasionally, handle sensitive data are not deployed in a locked down configuration where the user has no administrative rights? Does this mean that government network admins do not have visibility over who is using rogue software on their networks? It certainly seems that way and this just reinforces the message about low-hanging fruit in my previous post.

 

If you are concerned about the proliferation of rogue services or unwanted applications inside your environment (not to mention malware) take a look at the Threat Management Solution.


Bookmark
| More
This entry was posted on Wednesday, 29. July 2009 and is filed under "Opinion, data leakage". You can follow any responses to this entry with RSS 2.0. You can leave a response here, or send a trackback from your own site.

2 Comments to "Obama Safe House location leaked over P2P"

Obama Safe House location leaked over P2P » CounterMeasures « Jared Rimer’s Technology blog and podcast:
Monday, April 25th 2010, 10:15 pm -> Thursday, 30. July 2009 um 4:53 am

[...] Obama Safe House location leaked over P2P » CounterMeasures. [...]

Jim Ogilvie:
Monday, April 25th 2010, 10:15 pm -> Wednesday, 30. December 2009 um 11:59 pm

Yet another excuse for our overlords to ban something. Bet they couldn’t be happier. It’s just a pity the American people are so wrapped up in reality tv and other mind destroying pursuits to hang every single politician and bureaucrat from a tree with barbed wire.


Name:

E-Mail (not published)

Website:


Spam protection


© Copyright 2010 Trend Micro Inc. All rights reserved.
Legal Notice | Disclaimer