<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dutch Spammer fined €250000</title>
	<atom:link href="http://countermeasures.trendmicro.eu/dutch-spammer-fined-e250000/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://countermeasures.trendmicro.eu/dutch-spammer-fined-e250000/</link>
	<description>Trend Micro’s Rik Ferguson blogs about current security issues.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:11:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: spenser</title>
		<link>http://countermeasures.trendmicro.eu/dutch-spammer-fined-e250000/comment-page-1/#comment-3475</link>
		<dc:creator>spenser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 21:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://countermeasures.trendmicro.eu/?p=1099#comment-3475</guid>
		<description>Spam legislation and prosecutions are much too cumbersome.

There are two free market examples where spam is effectively limited by financial reality.

1. postal mail

2. sms text messages

The basis is in a &quot;sender pays for delivery&quot; model. Note that this is especially highlighted in the case of SMS. In most parts of the world SMS spam does not seem to be a problem because messages are always paid for by the sender. In North America, it can be a problem on those services where the recipient pays, but not those where the sender pays.

Once a sender has to pay for delivery, it completely changes the economic equations for the spammer. Unlimited volumes no longer work because it costs too much to make a profit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spam legislation and prosecutions are much too cumbersome.</p>
<p>There are two free market examples where spam is effectively limited by financial reality.</p>
<p>1. postal mail</p>
<p>2. sms text messages</p>
<p>The basis is in a &#8220;sender pays for delivery&#8221; model. Note that this is especially highlighted in the case of SMS. In most parts of the world SMS spam does not seem to be a problem because messages are always paid for by the sender. In North America, it can be a problem on those services where the recipient pays, but not those where the sender pays.</p>
<p>Once a sender has to pay for delivery, it completely changes the economic equations for the spammer. Unlimited volumes no longer work because it costs too much to make a profit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dutch Spammer fined €250000 » CounterMeasures &#171; Jared Rimer&#8217;s Technology blog and podcast</title>
		<link>http://countermeasures.trendmicro.eu/dutch-spammer-fined-e250000/comment-page-1/#comment-3205</link>
		<dc:creator>Dutch Spammer fined €250000 » CounterMeasures &#171; Jared Rimer&#8217;s Technology blog and podcast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://countermeasures.trendmicro.eu/?p=1099#comment-3205</guid>
		<description>[...] Dutch Spammer fined €250000 » CounterMeasures. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dutch Spammer fined €250000 » CounterMeasures. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

